Likenesses of Anne Boleyn are legion - two
sketches by Holbein, a tiny enamel in a locket ring, a miniature by Horenbout -
the list goes on. Of all the debated images, one has been the most famous, a
picture of a lady wearing an initial 'B' around her neck. Yet even this popular
and widely duplicated image of Anne has been challenged. In 2007, the
organizers of the Lost Faces: Identity
and Discovery in Tudor Royal Portraiture exhibition dismissed it as an
Elizabethan fabrication. She was made to look 'something of a wicked witch', in line
with hostile contemporary Catholic descriptions, they opined!1
Anne Boleyn, by an Unknown Artist. The National Portrait Gallery, London |
While this was a purely subjective point of view, in
2009, historian Susan James offered what she felt was compelling evidence that
this portrait type of Anne Boleyn was not actually of her.2 James insisted that
such images were not of Henry VIII's second wife, but of his sister Mary Tudor,
the former Queen of France and wife of Charles Brandon Duke of Suffolk . The 'B', James said, stood for
'Brandon', not 'Boleyn'. As proof, she compared a portrait of Mary to a
miniature of Anne by John Hoskins. Anne's likeness, according to James, was
evidently modelled after her sister-in-law's. Due to the lack of surviving
images of Anne, Elizabethan painters looked to Mary to re-invent her.
Mary Tudor and Charles Brandon, by an Unknown Artist. Collection of the Earl of Yarborough |
Anne Boleyn, by John Hoskins. Collection of the Duke of Buccleuch |
G.W. Bernard, despite being the bĂȘte noire of 'Team Anne' for advocating that its beloved Queen
might have been truly guilty of the sexual crimes she was accused of, pointed
out that the high ranking Mary, sister of the King of England and widow of the
King of France, would not have identified herself with the 'by no means socially
distinguished family name of Brandon'.3
Anne Boleyn, by an Unknown Artist. Bradford Museums and Galleries (formerly at Nidd Hall) |
NOTES
2. S. James, The Feminine Dynamic in English art, 1485-1603: Women as Consumers, Patrons and Painters, Burlington, VT, Ashgate, 2009, pgs. 126-127.
3. G.W. Bernard, Anne Boleyn - Fatal Attractions, New Haven, Yale University Press, 2010, pg. 199.
4. The Guardian (link accessed Feb. 16, 2015). The idea to match the 1534 medal to portraits of Anne Boleyn was suggested by Lucy Churchill to the FACES project (link accessed Feb. 17, 2015). Lucy Churchill, a stone carver by profession, had made a reconstruction of the medal by studying the original.
5. I've discussed the Nidd Hall picture in a previous article, where I offered the opinion that it may have been based on a portrait type of Henry VIII's third wife Jane Seymour. See: http://tudorfaces.blogspot.ca/2015/01/a-reassessment-of-queen-anne-boleyns.html
6. See: http://www.theanneboleynfiles.com/update-nidd-hall-portrait-1534-anne-boleyn-medal-press-articles-not-correct/
I hadn't heard of Susan James's theory before so thank you for raising it Roland.
ReplyDeleteIt's true that the French Hood model of portraits show a delicate featured woman, more similar to this depiction of Mary than other images of Anne (the Moost Happi medal obviously, but also other contenders such as the Nidd Hall painting and Holbein's Windsor sketch).
I find the French Hood paintings so refined that they gone beyond an attempt to depict a real woman and are like an icon (For example the jawbone which in these depictions appears delicate beyond belief). As Elizabeth loved iconic portraits of herself it stands to reason that her loyal subjects would have been keen to display similarly prettified images of her mother.